Correct minAreaRect angle to be in range [-90, 0) #28051
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
Box angle range over all imgproc tests is in interval `[-90, -0.0581199]`
resolves https://github.com/opencv/opencv/issues/27667
resolves https://github.com/opencv/opencv/issues/19472
resolves https://github.com/opencv/opencv/issues/24436
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [x] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [x] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [x] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
Handle near-zero convexity in convexHull #28043
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
resolves https://github.com/opencv/opencv/issues/21482
closes https://github.com/opencv/opencv/issues/14401
Also skip a code that determines orientation inside rotatingCalipers and rely on the order after convexHull
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [x] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [x] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [x] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
Added BitShift option to CLAHE #28014
Briefly, this PR is the fix of https://github.com/opencv/opencv/issues/28002
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [x] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [ ] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [ ] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
imgproc: supports CV_SIMD_SCALABLE in pointSetBoundingRect #27479
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [ ] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [ ] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [ ] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
Fixed standard HoughLines output shift for rho. #27992
Closes: https://github.com/opencv/opencv/issues/25038
Replaces: https://github.com/opencv/opencv/pull/25043
Merge with https://github.com/opencv/opencv_extra/pull/1288
The original implementation introduces systematic shift (-rho/2) for odd indexes. Integer division just gives proper rounding.
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [ ] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [ ] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [ ] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [ ] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
Remove performance bottleneck caused by redundant type conversions in the
initGMMs() function's tight nested loops that iterate over all image pixels.
Changes:
- Changed storage vectors from Vec3f to Vec3b to store pixel data directly
without intermediate conversion
- Modified kmeans preparation to convert Vec3b data to CV_32FC1 only when
creating the Mat for clustering (using convertTo instead of per-pixel cast)
- Explicitly convert Vec3b to Vec3d only when calling addSample() method
Performance Impact:
Previously: Vec3b -> Vec3f (in loop) -> Vec3d (implicit in addSample)
Now: Vec3b (in loop) -> Vec3d (explicit, only in addSample call)
This eliminates one unnecessary type conversion per pixel in the tight loop,
reducing computational overhead especially for large images.
Fixes#27968
Try to fix distant points to save time when ThickLine() calls FillConvexPoly() #27366
Proposal for #27365
cv::clipLine() is useful, but one should take care of a margin to preserve line caps.
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [X] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [X] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [ ] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [ ] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
Refactor minEnclosingCircle tests #27900
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
Separate input points for tests
Before this, next input points depended on previous ones and it was not obvious which input points specific test checked
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [ ] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [ ] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [ ] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
Improved blur #27822
* Perform row and column filter operations in a single pass.
* Temporary storage of intermediate results are avoided.
* Impacts 32F and 64F inputs for ksize <=5.
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [ ] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [ ] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [ ] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
imgproc: add minEnclosingConvexPolygon #27369
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [ ] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [ ] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [ ] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [ ] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
Improved Gaussian Blur #27795
- Horizontal and vertical kernels of 3N131 and 5N14641 are combined for non-border(inner) regions.
- Temporary storage of intermediate results are avoided by combining the kernels.
- Further refinement of other 3N, 5N to be added later.
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [ ] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [x] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [x] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
Set limitation to IPP Bilateral Filter tiles number to avoid too small tiles #27720
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
This PR fixes the following issue in Bilateral Filter tiling in IPP integration: image ROI can't be closer to the image border than the filter window radius. This issue shows itself during separation of the image to tiles for multithreaded processing. If the tile size small enough, the second tile is closer to the upper image border than the bilateral filter radius, which leads to the incorrect result. To fix this, we need a limitation to the tile size - done in this PR.
_Note: red build status looks like unrelated to the current change_
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [ ] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [ ] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [ ] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
Improve fitEllipseDirect tests #27717
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
Previous `fit_and_check_ellipse` implementation was very weak - it only checks that points center lies inside ellipse.
Current implementation `fit_and_check_ellipse` checks that points RMS (Root Mean Square) algebraic distance is quite small. It means that on average points are near boundary of ellipse. Because for points on ellipse algebraic distance is equal to `0` and for points that are close to boundary of ellipse is quite small
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [ ] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [ ] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [ ] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
Fix checking that point lies inside ellipse #27704
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
Previous `check_pt_in_ellipse` implementation was incorrect. For points on ellipse `cv::norm(to_pt)` should be equal to `el_dist`.
I tested current implementation with following Python script:
```
import cv2
import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
from matplotlib.patches import Ellipse
def check_pt_in_ellipse(pt, el):
center, axes, angle = ellipse
to_pt = pt - center
el_angle = angle * np.pi / 180
to_pt_r_x = to_pt[0] * np.cos(-el_angle) - to_pt[1] * np.sin(-el_angle)
to_pt_r_y = to_pt[0] * np.sin(-el_angle) + to_pt[1] * np.cos(-el_angle)
pt_angle = np.arctan2(to_pt_r_y / axes[1], to_pt_r_x / axes[0])
x_dist = 0.5 * axes[0] * np.cos(pt_angle)
y_dist = 0.5 * axes[1] * np.sin(pt_angle)
el_dist = np.sqrt(x_dist * x_dist + y_dist * y_dist)
assert abs(np.linalg.norm(to_pt) - el_dist) < 1e-10
# TEST(Imgproc_FitEllipse_Issue_4515, accuracy) {
points = np.array([
[327, 317],
[328, 316],
[329, 315],
[330, 314],
[331, 314],
[332, 314],
[333, 315],
[333, 316],
[333, 317],
[333, 318],
[333, 319],
[333, 320],
])
ellipse = cv2.fitEllipseDirect(points)
center, axes, angle = ellipse
angle_rad = np.deg2rad(angle)
points_on_ellipse = []
for point_angle_deg in range(0, 360, 10):
point_angle = np.deg2rad(point_angle_deg)
point = np.array([0., 0.])
point_x = axes[0] * 0.5 * np.cos(point_angle)
point_y = axes[1] * 0.5 * np.sin(point_angle)
point[0] = point_x * np.cos(angle_rad) - point_y * np.sin(angle_rad)
point[1] = point_x * np.sin(angle_rad) + point_y * np.cos(angle_rad)
point[0] += center[0]
point[1] += center[1]
points_on_ellipse.append(point)
points_on_ellipse = np.array(points_on_ellipse)
for point in points_on_ellipse:
check_pt_in_ellipse(point, ellipse)
plt.figure(figsize=(8, 8))
plt.scatter(points[:, 0], points[:, 1], c='red', label='points')
plt.scatter(points_on_ellipse[:, 0], points_on_ellipse[:, 1], c='yellow', label='ellipse')
ellipse = Ellipse(xy=center, width=axes[0], height=axes[1],
angle=angle, facecolor='none', edgecolor='b')
plt.gca().add_patch(ellipse)
plt.gca().set_aspect('equal')
plt.legend()
plt.show()
```
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [ ] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [ ] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [ ] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
Subdiv2d rect2f clean #27641
Closes https://github.com/opencv/opencv/issues/27623
Changes:
- Added Subdiv2D(Rect2f) constructor overload
- Added initDelaunay(Rect2f) method overload
- No changes to the previous implementation to keep it backward compatible
- Added tests for init and testing with edge case of extremely small coordinates
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [x] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [x] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [x] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
See original pull request at : https://github.com/opencv/opencv/pull/27631
imgproc: Bilateral filter performance improvement #27433
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [ ] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [x] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [ ] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
optimize some drawing with stack allocation #27599
Some drawings can try a stack allocation instead of a std::vector
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [X] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [ ] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [ ] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [ ] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
Take into account overflow for connected components #27582
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
Fix#27568
The problem was caused by a label type overflow (`debug_example.npy` contains `92103` labels, that doesn't fit in the `CV_16U` (`unsigned short`) type). If pass `CV_32S` instead of `CV_16U` as `ltype` - everything will be calculated successfully
Added overflow detection to throw exception with a clear error message instead of strange segfault/assertion error
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [x] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [x] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [x] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
Fixed build issue with some old GCC versions #27569
Fixes build for GCC 4.8.5 at least. Looks like the method default signature differs cross GCC versions or newer version has softer checker.
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [ ] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [ ] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [ ] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [ ] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
Issue 26972: Proper treatment of float values in intersectConvexConvex #26974
As outlined in https://github.com/opencv/opencv/issues/26972 the function `intersectConvexConvex()` may not work as expected in the corner case, where two polygons intersect at a corner. A concrete example is given that I added as unit test. The unit test would fail without the proposed bug fix. I recommend porting the fix to all versions.
Now concerning the fix: When digging into the implementation I found, that when the line intersections are computed, openCV currently does not apply floating point comparison syntax, but pretends that line end points are exact. Instead I replaced the formulation using the eps that is already used in another component of the function in line.277: `epx=1e-5`. IMO that is solid enough, definitely better than assuming an exact floating point comparison is possible.
As a follow up I would suggest to use a scalable eps, s.t. also cases with high floating point numbers would be less error prone. However that would need to be done in all relevant sub steps, not just the line intersection code. So for me outside the scope of this fix.
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [ ] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [ ] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [ ] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
imgproc: vectorize cv::createHanningWindow #27368
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [ ] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [ ] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [ ] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
Correct IPP distanceTransform results with single thread #27432
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
resolves#24082
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [x] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [x] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [x] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
Add HoughCirclesWithAccumulator binding #27389
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
Fix#27377
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [x] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [x] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [x] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
Fix#25696: Solved the problem in Subdiv2D, empty delaunay triangulation #27149
Detailed description
Expected behaviour:
Given 4 points, where no three points are collinear, the Delaunay Triangulation Algorithm should return 2 triangles.
Actual:
The algorithm returns zero triangles in this particular case.
Fix:
The radius of the circumcircle tends to infinity when the points are closer to form collinear points, so the problem occurs because the super-triangles are not large enough,
which then results in certain edges are not swapped. The proposed solution just increases the super triangle, duplicating the value of constant for example.
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [x] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [ ] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [ ] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
build: fix more warnings from recent gcc versions after #27337#27343
More fixings after https://github.com/opencv/opencv/pull/27337
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [ ] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [ ] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [ ] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
Fix typos #27338
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [ ] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [ ] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [ ] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
Dmitry Kurtaev
Alexander Smorkalov
Alexander Smorkalov
harunresit
penghuiho
Yuantao Feng
Samaresh Kumar Singh
Pierre Chatelier
MaximSmolskiy
ashish-sriram
SaraKuhnert
Madan mohan Manokar
underdevelopedprefrontalcortex
Nadezhda Mizonova
Aditya Jha
ekharkov
eplankin
Martin
Souriya Trinh
Kavyansh Tyagi
Liane Lin
omahs