Refactor minEnclosingCircle tests #27900
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
Separate input points for tests
Before this, next input points depended on previous ones and it was not obvious which input points specific test checked
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [ ] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [ ] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [ ] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
imgproc: add minEnclosingConvexPolygon #27369
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [ ] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [ ] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [ ] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [ ] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
Improve fitEllipseDirect tests #27717
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
Previous `fit_and_check_ellipse` implementation was very weak - it only checks that points center lies inside ellipse.
Current implementation `fit_and_check_ellipse` checks that points RMS (Root Mean Square) algebraic distance is quite small. It means that on average points are near boundary of ellipse. Because for points on ellipse algebraic distance is equal to `0` and for points that are close to boundary of ellipse is quite small
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [ ] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [ ] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [ ] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
Fix checking that point lies inside ellipse #27704
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
Previous `check_pt_in_ellipse` implementation was incorrect. For points on ellipse `cv::norm(to_pt)` should be equal to `el_dist`.
I tested current implementation with following Python script:
```
import cv2
import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
from matplotlib.patches import Ellipse
def check_pt_in_ellipse(pt, el):
center, axes, angle = ellipse
to_pt = pt - center
el_angle = angle * np.pi / 180
to_pt_r_x = to_pt[0] * np.cos(-el_angle) - to_pt[1] * np.sin(-el_angle)
to_pt_r_y = to_pt[0] * np.sin(-el_angle) + to_pt[1] * np.cos(-el_angle)
pt_angle = np.arctan2(to_pt_r_y / axes[1], to_pt_r_x / axes[0])
x_dist = 0.5 * axes[0] * np.cos(pt_angle)
y_dist = 0.5 * axes[1] * np.sin(pt_angle)
el_dist = np.sqrt(x_dist * x_dist + y_dist * y_dist)
assert abs(np.linalg.norm(to_pt) - el_dist) < 1e-10
# TEST(Imgproc_FitEllipse_Issue_4515, accuracy) {
points = np.array([
[327, 317],
[328, 316],
[329, 315],
[330, 314],
[331, 314],
[332, 314],
[333, 315],
[333, 316],
[333, 317],
[333, 318],
[333, 319],
[333, 320],
])
ellipse = cv2.fitEllipseDirect(points)
center, axes, angle = ellipse
angle_rad = np.deg2rad(angle)
points_on_ellipse = []
for point_angle_deg in range(0, 360, 10):
point_angle = np.deg2rad(point_angle_deg)
point = np.array([0., 0.])
point_x = axes[0] * 0.5 * np.cos(point_angle)
point_y = axes[1] * 0.5 * np.sin(point_angle)
point[0] = point_x * np.cos(angle_rad) - point_y * np.sin(angle_rad)
point[1] = point_x * np.sin(angle_rad) + point_y * np.cos(angle_rad)
point[0] += center[0]
point[1] += center[1]
points_on_ellipse.append(point)
points_on_ellipse = np.array(points_on_ellipse)
for point in points_on_ellipse:
check_pt_in_ellipse(point, ellipse)
plt.figure(figsize=(8, 8))
plt.scatter(points[:, 0], points[:, 1], c='red', label='points')
plt.scatter(points_on_ellipse[:, 0], points_on_ellipse[:, 1], c='yellow', label='ellipse')
ellipse = Ellipse(xy=center, width=axes[0], height=axes[1],
angle=angle, facecolor='none', edgecolor='b')
plt.gca().add_patch(ellipse)
plt.gca().set_aspect('equal')
plt.legend()
plt.show()
```
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [ ] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [ ] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [ ] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
Subdiv2d rect2f clean #27641
Closes https://github.com/opencv/opencv/issues/27623
Changes:
- Added Subdiv2D(Rect2f) constructor overload
- Added initDelaunay(Rect2f) method overload
- No changes to the previous implementation to keep it backward compatible
- Added tests for init and testing with edge case of extremely small coordinates
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [x] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [x] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [x] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
See original pull request at : https://github.com/opencv/opencv/pull/27631
Take into account overflow for connected components #27582
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
Fix#27568
The problem was caused by a label type overflow (`debug_example.npy` contains `92103` labels, that doesn't fit in the `CV_16U` (`unsigned short`) type). If pass `CV_32S` instead of `CV_16U` as `ltype` - everything will be calculated successfully
Added overflow detection to throw exception with a clear error message instead of strange segfault/assertion error
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [x] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [x] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [x] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
Issue 26972: Proper treatment of float values in intersectConvexConvex #26974
As outlined in https://github.com/opencv/opencv/issues/26972 the function `intersectConvexConvex()` may not work as expected in the corner case, where two polygons intersect at a corner. A concrete example is given that I added as unit test. The unit test would fail without the proposed bug fix. I recommend porting the fix to all versions.
Now concerning the fix: When digging into the implementation I found, that when the line intersections are computed, openCV currently does not apply floating point comparison syntax, but pretends that line end points are exact. Instead I replaced the formulation using the eps that is already used in another component of the function in line.277: `epx=1e-5`. IMO that is solid enough, definitely better than assuming an exact floating point comparison is possible.
As a follow up I would suggest to use a scalable eps, s.t. also cases with high floating point numbers would be less error prone. However that would need to be done in all relevant sub steps, not just the line intersection code. So for me outside the scope of this fix.
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [ ] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [ ] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [ ] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
Correct IPP distanceTransform results with single thread #27432
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
resolves#24082
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [x] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [x] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [x] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
Fix#25696: Solved the problem in Subdiv2D, empty delaunay triangulation #27149
Detailed description
Expected behaviour:
Given 4 points, where no three points are collinear, the Delaunay Triangulation Algorithm should return 2 triangles.
Actual:
The algorithm returns zero triangles in this particular case.
Fix:
The radius of the circumcircle tends to infinity when the points are closer to form collinear points, so the problem occurs because the super-triangles are not large enough,
which then results in certain edges are not swapped. The proposed solution just increases the super triangle, duplicating the value of constant for example.
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [x] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [ ] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [ ] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
Fix typos #27338
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [ ] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [ ] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [ ] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
imgproc: cvtColor: remove to copy edge pixels for COLOR_Bayer*_VNGs. #27226
Close https://github.com/opencv/opencv/issues/27225
Close https://github.com/opencv/opencv/issues/5089
Related https://github.com/opencv/opencv_extra/pull/1249
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [x] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [x] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [ ] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
imgproc: disable SIMD for compareHist(INTERSECT) if f64 is unsupported #27220
Close https://github.com/opencv/opencv/issues/24757
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [x] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [x] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [ ] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
Added optional mask to cv::threshold #26842
Proposal for #26777
To avoid code duplication, and keep performance when no mask is used, inner implementation always propagate the const cv::Mat& mask, but they use a template<bool useMask> parameter that let the compiler optimize out unnecessary tests when the mask is not to be used.
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [X] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [X] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [X] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [ ] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
Fix getPerspectiveTransform for singular case #26926
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
Fix#26916
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [x] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [x] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [x] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
Removal of deprecated functions in imgproc #26914
Fixes : #26410
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [x] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [ ] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [ ] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
Add cv::THRESH_DRYRUN flag to get adaptive threshold values without thresholding #26836
A first proposal for #26777
Adds a `cv::THRESH_DRYRUN` flag to let cv::threshold() compute the threshold (useful for OTSU/TRIANGLE), but without actually running the thresholding. This flags is a proposal instead of a new function cv::computeThreshold()
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [X] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [X] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [X] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [ ] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
Improve robustness for fitEllipseAMS #26810
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
Related to #26694
Added functionality to add noise to points in degenerate cases and try again for `fitEllipseAMS`. `fitEllipseNoDirect` and `fitEllipseDirect` already have this
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [x] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [x] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [x] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
Improve robustness for ellipse fitting #26773
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
Related to #26694
Current noise addition is not very good because for example it turns degenerate case of one horizontal line into degenerate case of two parallel horizontal lines
Improving noise addition leads to improved robustness of algorithms
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [x] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [x] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [x] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
Feature: weighted Hough Transform #21407
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or other license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to proper branch
- [x] There is reference to original bug report and related work
- [x] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [x] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
Alexander Smorkalov
Maxim Smolskiy
Alexander Smorkalov
SaraKuhnert
Aditya Jha
Martin
Souriya Trinh
Dmitry Kurtaev
Kavyansh Tyagi
Liane Lin
omahs
Abhishek Gola
Kumataro
YooLc
Pierre Chatelier
Skreg
shyama7004
Masahiro Ogawa