core: fix inverted continuity check in cvReshapeMatND() #29132
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [√] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [√] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [ ] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [ ] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [ ] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [ ] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
Better Durand-Kerner Initialization #29109
While investigating issue #23644, I have found [this paper](https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF01935059) which presents a good initialization for the Durand-Kerner algorithm. Basically the idea is to put the initial points equidistantly on a circle on the complex plane. The radius of the circle is computed as
<img width="607" height="178" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/ea31b002-c924-4b93-9334-3e59597c896b" />
Note that the $a_i$ coefficients in that paper are reversed compared to OpenCV. That's where the `(n - i)` in the code comes from.
I have implemented just the mean of the $u_i$'s for the sake of simplicity. That's already enough to make the algorithm converge in all cases I have tested. I have used this to test for convergence for many polynomials of order 2 and 4 and coefficients of different magnitudes:
```cpp
TEST(Core_SolvePoly, large_test)
{
cv::Mat_<float> coefs3(1,3);
cv::Mat_<float> coefs5(1,5);
cv::Mat r;
double prec;
for (int c0 = -20; c0 <= 20; c0++)
{
coefs3.at<float>(0) = c0;
for (int c1 = -20; c1 <= 20; c1++)
{
coefs3.at<float>(1) = c1;
for (int c2 = -20; c2 <= 20; c2++)
{
coefs3.at<float>(2) = c2;
prec = cv::solvePoly(coefs3, r);
EXPECT_LE(prec, 1e-6);
}
}
}
for (int c0 = -10; c0 <= 10; c0++)
{
coefs5.at<float>(0) = c0;
for (int c1 = -10; c1 <= 10; c1++)
{
coefs5.at<float>(1) = c1;
for (int c2 = -10; c2 <= 10; c2++)
{
coefs5.at<float>(2) = c2;
for (int c3 = -10; c3 <= 10; c3++)
{
coefs5.at<float>(3) = c3;
for (int c4 = -10; c4 <= 10; c4++)
{
coefs5.at<float>(4) = c4;
prec = cv::solvePoly(coefs5, r);
EXPECT_LE(prec, 1e-2);
}
}
}
}
}
for (int i = -10; i < 10; i++)
{
coefs3.at<float>(0) = pow(2, i);
for (int j = -10; j < 10; j++)
{
coefs3.at<float>(1) = pow(2, j);
for (int k = -10; k < 10; k++)
{
coefs3.at<float>(2) = pow(2, k);
prec = cv::solvePoly(coefs3, r);
EXPECT_LE(prec, 1e-6);
}
}
}
}
```
This test passes, but I have not committed it because it runs for a couple of seconds.
This fixes#23644 and replaces #29055. I have checked #29055 and it does not pass the test above. It seems to be optimized to the precise polynomial of #23644.
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [x] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [x] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [x] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
core(rvv): fix v_matmul/v_matmuladd scalable semantics and expand lane-group test coverage #29080
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [x] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [x] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [x] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
<!-- Note!!! If you are an automated agent, we have a special process for you: add 🤖🤖🤖 to the end of the PR title. -->
## Platform
SpacemiT X60 (K1), 8-core RISC-V RVV 1.0, VLEN=256, 16GB RAM, OS: Bianbu Linux (kernel 6.6.63), GCC 13.2.0, Build: OpenCV 4.14.0-pre, Release, HAL: YES (RVV HAL 0.0.1)
## Motivation
OpenCV's Universal Intrinsics `v_matmul` and `v_matmuladd` have a semantic bug in the RVV scalable backend (`modules/core/include/opencv2/core/hal/intrin_rvv_scalable.hpp`).
The current implementation uses `v_extract_n(v, 0/1/2/3)` with hardcoded indices, assuming the vector holds exactly 4 float lanes (128-bit fixed). On hardware with VLEN=256 (e.g. SpacemiT K1 / BPI-F3), `v_float32` with LMUL=2 holds 16 lanes. As a result, lanes 4–15 silently reuse the inputs from lanes 0–3, producing wrong results.
OpenCV itself acknowledges this in `modules/core/src/matmul.simd.hpp`:
// v_matmuladd for RVV is 128-bit only but not scalable,
// this will fail the test Core_Transform.accuracy
The RVV scalable `transform_32f` path has been disabled because of this bug. However, the existing `TheTest<R>::test_matmul()` only checked the first 4-lane group (the outer loop was effectively hardcoded to `int i = 0`), so the bug was never caught by CI even on wide-vector backends.
## Modification
**Test fix** (`modules/core/test/test_intrin_utils.hpp`): Expanded `test_matmul()` to iterate over all 4-lane groups:
// Before (only checked lane group i=0)
int i = 0;
for (int j = i; j < i + 4; ++j) { ... }
// After (checks all lane groups)
for (int i = 0; i < VTraits<R>::vlanes(); i += 4)
{
for (int j = i; j < i + 4; ++j) { ... }
}
**Kernel fix** (`modules/core/include/opencv2/core/hal/intrin_rvv_scalable.hpp`): Rewrote `v_matmul` and `v_matmuladd` to process all 4-lane groups correctly. Each group of 4 lanes now independently computes the full matrix multiply using its own `v[i], v[i+1], v[i+2], v[i+3]` inputs. The `transform_32f` RVV path in `matmul.simd.hpp` remains disabled as the autovectorized path shows better performance on current hardware.
## Experiment 1: Bug reproduced on SpacemiT K1 (VLEN=256)
./opencv_test_core --gtest_filter="*intrin*"
Result: `hal_intrin128.float32x4_BASELINE` FAILED with 24 failures, all from lane groups i=4, i=8, i=12 (lanes 4–15).
Representative failures from `v_matmul` (line 1526):
i=4 j=4: actual=158 expected=56
i=4 j=5: actual=166.39999 expected=59.200001
i=8 j=8: actual=314.39999 expected=68.800003
i=12 j=12: actual=512.40002 expected=81.599998
Representative failures from `v_matmuladd` (line 1540):
i=4 j=4: actual=147.5 expected=51.5
i=8 j=8: actual=284.70001 expected=60.700001
i=12 j=12: actual=453.89999 expected=69.900002
Lane group i=0 (j=0..3) passed correctly — confirming the bug only affects lanes beyond the first 4, exactly as expected from the hardcoded `v_extract_n(v, 0/1/2/3)` implementation.
## Experiment 2: Both tests pass after fixing the kernel
./opencv_test_core --gtest_filter='hal_intrin128.float32x4_BASELINE'
[ OK ] hal_intrin128.float32x4_BASELINE (1859 ms)
[ PASSED ] 1 test.
./opencv_test_core --gtest_filter='Core_Transform.accuracy'
[ OK ] Core_Transform.accuracy (819 ms)
[ PASSED ] 1 test.
## Experiment 3: RVV transform path remains disabled (performance regression)
After re-enabling the RVV scalable `transform_32f` path experimentally, benchmarks showed a significant regression vs the compiler-autovectorized scalar path (CV_32FC3):
Size RVV path Scalar path Ratio
640x480 7.83 ms 1.48 ms 5.3x slower
1280x720 23.96 ms 5.17 ms 4.6x slower
1920x1080 53.76 ms 10.12 ms 5.3x slower
The compiler-autovectorized path outperforms the hand-written RVV kernel for this workload, consistent with the original comment in `matmul.simd.hpp`. The `transform_32f` RVV path is therefore kept disabled in this PR. The kernel fix to `v_matmul`/`v_matmuladd` remains necessary for correctness on wide-vector hardware, and the expanded test ensures the bug cannot regress silently in future.
Rvv core norm #29057Fixesopencv/opencv#29052
### Problem
`Core_Norm/ElemWiseTest.accuracy/0` failed on RISC-V with RVV enabled when computing norm for `CV_16S` data.
The reported failing case was:
```text
src[0] ~ 16sC4 3-dim (1 x 116 x 40)
```
The expected norm result was a large positive `double`, but the RVV path returned an incorrect value:
```text
expected: 3370900308417
actual: -173296
```
This indicates that the problem was not in the public `cv::norm()` API, but in the RVV HAL implementation used for the `CV_16S` L2/L2SQR accumulation path.
### Root Cause
The RVV HAL has a specialized implementation for `CV_16S` L2 norm:
```cpp
NormL2_RVV<short, double>
```
The implementation widens `int16` values, squares them, converts the widened products to `float64`, accumulates them in an `f64m8` vector, and finally reduces the vector to a scalar `double`:
```cpp
auto s = __riscv_vfmv_v_f_f64m8(0, vlmax);
...
auto v_mul = __riscv_vwmul(v, v, vl);
s = __riscv_vfadd_tu(s, s, __riscv_vfwcvt_f(v_mul, vl), vl);
...
return __riscv_vfmv_f(__riscv_vfredosum(...));
```
The bug was in the scalar initializer passed to `__riscv_vfredosum`.
Before this patch, the code created an `f64m1` scalar vector but used the maximum vector length for `e32m1`:
```cpp
__riscv_vfmv_s_f_f64m1(0, __riscv_vsetvlmax_e32m1())
```
This is inconsistent: the vector type is `f64m1`, so the VL used to initialize it must correspond to `e64m1`, not `e32m1`.
Add ARMPL support for DFT Function #28664
- This PR introduces hal/armpl/ with implementation of 1D, 2D DFT and DCT routines using ARM Performance Libraries as a custom HAL replacement for OpenCV's DFT & DCT Function.
- ArmPL MSI package is automatically downloaded and extracted via CMake when building on Windows ARM64, with a WITH_ARMPL option that defaults to ON for that platform.
- Forward and inverse real DFT calls in dxt.cpp are routed through ArmPL when available, with scaling applied only when needed.
- Test error thresholds in test_dxt.cpp are relaxed (from 1e-5 to 2e-4 for float ) to account for numerical differences between ArmPL and OpenCV's reference DFT results.
**Performance Benchmarks :**
<img width="993" height="835" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/76def647-6d20-4bce-8bc9-7363e723669f" />
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- Replace unsafe pointer arithmetic and direct buffer modification with std::string methods.
- Update documentation to clarify that the last digit is used as compression level and truncated from the actual filename.
- Add test cases for .gz and .gz0-9
core: fix heap-buffer-overflow in YAML parseKey for empty keys #28620
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [x] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [ ] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [ ] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
### Description
Fixes https://github.com/opencv/opencv/issues/28619
Moves the "empty key" check before the backward do-while scan in `YAMLParser::parseKey()`.
**Problem:** When parsing a YAML mapping with an empty key (e.g. `: 10` at column 0), `endptr == ptr` after the forward scan finds `:`. The do-while loop `do c = *--endptr; while(c == ' ')` always executes at least once, so it decrements `endptr` to `ptr-1` and reads one byte before the heap allocation (ASan: heap-buffer-overflow READ of size 1).
**Fix:** Check `endptr == ptr` before entering the backward loop. If the key is empty, raise `CV_PARSE_ERROR_CPP("An empty key")` immediately without the OOB read.
This contribution was developed with AI assistance (Claude Code).
PR #27972 added _dst.create(size(), type()) in copyTo's empty() block.
In Debug builds, Mat::release() was resetting flags to MAGIC_VAL,
clearing the type information and causing assertion failures when
destination has fixedType().
Preserve type flags in Mat::release() debug mode by using:
flags = (flags & CV_MAT_TYPE_MASK) | MAGIC_VAL
Thanks to @akretz for suggesting this better approach.
modified Input/OutputArray methods to handle 'std::vector<T>' or 'std::vector<std::vector<T>>' properly #28242
This is port of #26408 with some further improvements (all switch-by-vector-type statements are consolidated in a single macro)
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [ ] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [ ] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [ ] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [ ] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
core: fix solveCubic numerical instability via coefficient normalization (fixes#27748) #28117
Summary
This PR fixes numerical instability in `cv::solveCubic` when the leading coefficient `a` is non-zero but extremely small relative to other coefficients (Issue #27748).
It introduces a **normalization step** that scales all coefficients by their maximum magnitude before solving. This ensures robust detection of when the equation should degenerate to a quadratic solver, without breaking valid cubic equations that happen to have small coefficients (e.g., scaled by 1e-9).
The Problem (Issue #27748)
The previous implementation checked `if (a == 0)` to decide whether to use the cubic or quadratic formula.
- When `a` is extremely small (e.g., 1e-17) but not exactly zero, and other coefficients are normal (e.g., 5.0), the standard cubic formula suffers from catastrophic cancellation and overflow, producing incorrect roots (e.g., 1e14).
The Fix
1. Normalization: The solver now finds `max_coeff = max(|a|, |b|, |c|, |d|)` and scales all coefficients by `1.0 / max_coeff`.
2. Relative Threshold: It then checks `if (abs(a) < epsilon)` on the *normalized* coefficients.
Why this is better than previous attempts
In a previous attempt (PR #28057), a simple absolute check `abs(a) < epsilon` was proposed. That approach was rejected because it failed for scaled equations.
Fixes#27748
rvv_hal: fix flip inplace #28180
Fixes https://github.com/opencv/opencv/issues/28124
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [x] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [x] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [x] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
core: add copyAt() for ROI operation #27318
Close https://github.com/opencv/opencv/issues/27320
Close https://github.com/opencv/opencv/issues/27298
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [x] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [x] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [x] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
Force empty output type where it's defined in API #27972
The PR replaces:
- https://github.com/opencv/opencv/pull/27936
- https://github.com/opencv/opencv/pull/21059
Empty matrix has undefined type, so user code should not relay on the output type, if it's empty. The PR introduces some exceptions:
- copyTo documentation defines, that the method re-create output buffer and set it's type.
- convertTo has output type as parameter and output type is defined and expected.
core: support 16 bit LUT #27890
Close https://github.com/opencv/opencv/issues/26899
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [x] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [x] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [x] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
core: support parsing back slash \ in parseKey in FileStorage (JSON) #27587Fixes#27585
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [x] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [x] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [ ] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
core: support parsing null in json parser in FileStorage #27579
Fixes https://github.com/opencv/opencv/issues/27578
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [x] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [x] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [ ] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
Deprecate copyData Parameter in UMat Construction from std::vector and Always Copy Data #27408
Overview
This PR simplifies and modernizes the construction of cv::UMat from std::vector by removing the legacy copyData parameter, always copying the data, and ensuring clearer, safer semantics. This brings UMat in line with current best practices and paves the way for the upcoming OpenCV 5.x series.
What Changed?
1. Header Documentation Update
Removed confusing or obsolete documentation about copyData and clarified the behavior:
Old: builds matrix from std::vector with or without copying the data
New: builds matrix from std::vector. The data is always copied. The copyData parameter is deprecated and will be removed in OpenCV 5.0.
2. Implementation Update
In UMat::UMat(const std::vector<_Tp>& vec, bool copyData), the copyData parameter:
Is now ignored and marked as deprecated.
Marked with CV_UNUSED(copyData) for backward compatibility and to avoid warnings.
The constructor always copies the data from the input vector, regardless of the value of copyData.
All branching logic around copyData has been removed. Any code for "not copying" was not implemented and is now dropped.
This guarantees data safety and predictable behavior.
3. Test Added
A new test construct_from_vector in test_umat_from_vector.cpp:
Verifies that UMat copies the vector data, not referencing it.
Modifies the source vector after construction to confirm that the UMat is unaffected (proving copy, not reference).
Checks matrix shape, type, and content to ensure correctness.
Why This Change?
1. Safety and Predictability
Always copying avoids dangling references and hard-to-debug lifetime issues with stack/heap-allocated vectors.
Removes an undocumented, unimplemented branch (copyData=false).
2. Backward Compatibility
The constructor signature remains for now, but the copyData parameter is marked as deprecated and ignored.
Codebases that pass the parameter will still compile and run as before (but always copy).
3. API Clarity and Maintenance
Documentation now matches the real implementation.
No misleading expectations about zero-copy.
Code is cleaner, future-proof, and easier to maintain.
4. Preparation for OpenCV 5.0
The copyData parameter is deprecated and will be removed in OpenCV 5.x.
Prepares users and downstream libraries for the planned change.
How This Helps OpenCV Users and Developers
Guarantees data safety and makes behavior explicit.
Removes legacy/ambiguous code.
Provides a clear path to OpenCV 5.x.
Minimizes future migration pain.
Ensures all users see the same, reliable behavior (copy semantics).
Refer:#27409
Improve solveCubic accuracy #27347
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
Fix#27323
```
2e-13 * x^3 + x^2 - 2 * x + 1 = 0 -> x^3 + 5e12 * x^2 - 1e13 * x + 5e12 = 0
```
The problem that coefficients have quite big magnitudes and current calculations are subject to round-off error
```
Q = (a1 * a1 - 3 * a2) * (1./9)
R = (2 * a1 * a1 * a1 - 9 * a1 * a2 + 27 * a3) * (1./54)
Qcubed = Q * Q * Q = a1^6/729 - (a1^4 a2)/81 + (a1^2 a2^2)/27 - a2^3/27
R * R = R^2 = a1^6/729 - (a1^4 a2)/81 + (a1^2 a2^2)/36 + (a1^3 a3)/27 - (a1 a2 a3)/6 + a3^2/4
d = Qcubed - R * R
```
Let `a1`, `a2`, `a3` have quite big same magnitudes, then we see that `Qcubed` and `R * R` have same terms `a1^6/729` and `-(a1^4 a2)/81` (which will be reduced in `d`), but they level out the other terms (these terms have `6`th and `5`th degree and other terms - less or equal than `4`th degree).
So, if these terms will participate in the calculation, this will lead to a huge round-off error.
But if we expand the expression, then round-off error should be less
```
d = Qcubed - R * R = 1/108 (a1^2 a2^2 - 4 a2^3 - 4 a1^3 a3 + 18 a1 a2 a3 - 27 a3^2)
```
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [x] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [x] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [x] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
build: fix more warnings from recent gcc versions after #27337#27343
More fixings after https://github.com/opencv/opencv/pull/27337
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [ ] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [ ] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [ ] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
build: fix warnings from recent gcc versions #27337
This PR addresses the following found warnings:
- [x] -Wmaybe-uninitialized
- [x] -Wunused-variable
- [x] -Wsign-compare
Tested building with GCC 14.2 (RISC-V 64).
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [ ] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [ ] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [ ] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
Add tests for solveCubic #27331
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
Related to #27323
I found only randomized tests with number of roots always equal to `1` or `3`, `x^3 = 0` and some simple test for Java and Swift.
Obviously, they don't cover all cases (implementation has strong branching and number of roots can be equal to `-1`, `0` and `2` additionally).
So, I think it will be useful to try explicitly cover more cases (and implementation branches correspondingly)
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [x] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [x] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [x] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
FastCV gemm hal #27184
FastCV hal for gemm 32f
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [ ] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [ ] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [ ] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [ ] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
User-defined logger callback, C-style. #27154
This is a competing PR, an alternative to #27140
Both functions accept C-style pointer to static functions. Both functions allow restoring the OpenCV built-in implementation by passing in a nullptr.
- replaceWriteLogMessage
- replaceWriteLogMessageEx
This implementation is not compatible with C++ log handler objects.
This implementation has minimal thread safety, in the sense that the function pointer are stored and read atomically. But otherwise, the user-defined static functions must accept calls at all times, even after having been deregistered, because some log calls may have started before deregistering.
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [ ] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [ ] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [ ] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [ ] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
Impl hal_rvv LUT | Add more LUT test #26941
Implement through the existing `cv_hal_lut` interfaces.
Add more LUT accuracy and performance tests:
- **Accuracy test**: Multi-channel table tests are added, and the boundary of `randu` used for generating test data is broadened to make the test more robust.
- **Performance test**: Multi-channel input and multi-channel table tests are added.
Perf test done on
- MUSE-PI (vlen=256)
- Compiler: gcc 14.2 (riscv-collab/riscv-gnu-toolchain Nightly: December 16, 2024)
```sh
$ opencv_test_core --gtest_filter="Core_LUT*"
$ opencv_perf_core --gtest_filter="SizePrm_LUT*" --perf_min_samples=300 --perf_force_samples=300
```
```sh
Geometric mean (ms)
Name of Test scalar ui rvv ui rvv
vs vs
scalar scalar
(x-factor) (x-factor)
LUT::SizePrm::320x240 0.248 0.249 0.052 1.00 4.74
LUT::SizePrm::640x480 0.277 0.275 0.085 1.01 3.28
LUT::SizePrm::1920x1080 0.950 0.947 0.634 1.00 1.50
LUT_multi2::SizePrm::320x240 2.051 2.045 2.049 1.00 1.00
LUT_multi2::SizePrm::640x480 2.128 2.134 2.125 1.00 1.00
LUT_multi2::SizePrm::1920x1080 7.397 7.380 7.390 1.00 1.00
LUT_multi::SizePrm::320x240 0.715 0.747 0.154 0.96 4.64
LUT_multi::SizePrm::640x480 0.741 0.766 0.257 0.97 2.88
LUT_multi::SizePrm::1920x1080 2.766 2.765 1.925 1.00 1.44
```
This optimization is achieved by loading the entire lookup table into vector registers. Due to register size limitations, the optimization is only effective under the following conditions:
- For the U8C1 table type, the optimization works when `vlen >= 256`
- For U16C1, it works when `vlen >= 512`
- For U32C1, it works when `vlen >= 1024`
Since I don’t have real hardware with `vlen > 256`, the corresponding accuracy tests were conducted on QEMU built from the `riscv-collab/riscv-gnu-toolchain`.
This patch does not implement optimizations for multi-channel tables.
Previous attempts:
1. For the U8C1 table type, when `vlen = 128`, it is possible to use four `u8m4` vectors to load the entire table, perform gathering, and merge the results. However, the performance is almost the same as the scalar version.
2. Loading part of the table and repeatedly loading the source data is faster for small sizes. But as the table size grows, the performance quickly degrades compared to the scalar version.
3. Using `vluxei8` as a general solution does not show any performance improvement.
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [ ] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [ ] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [ ] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [ ] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
Fix issues in RISC-V Vector (RVV) Universal Intrinsic #27006
This PR aims to make `opencv_test_core` pass on RVV, via following two parts:
1. Fix bug in Universal Intrinsic when VLEN >= 512:
- `max_nlanes` should be multiplied by 2, because we use LMUL=2 in RVV Universal Intrinsic since #26318.
- Related tests are also expanded to match longer registers
- Relax the precision threshold of `v_erf` to make the tests pass
2. Temporary fix #26936
- Disable 3 Universal Intrinsic code blocks on GCC
- This is just a temporary fix until we figure out if it's our issue or GCC/something else's
This patch is tested under the following conditions:
- Compier: GCC 14.2, Clang 19.1.7
- Device: Muse-Pi (VLEN=256), QEMU (VLEN=512, 1024)
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [ ] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [ ] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [ ] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [ ] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
Fix bug with int64 support for FileStorage #26846
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
Fix#26829, https://github.com/opencv/opencv-python/issues/1078
In current implementation of `int64` support raw size of recorded integer is variable (`4` or `8` bytes depending on value). But then we iterate over nodes we need to know it exact value
https://github.com/opencv/opencv/blob/dfad11aae7ef3b3a0643379266bc363b1a9c3d40/modules/core/src/persistence.cpp#L2596-L2609
Bug is that `rawSize` method still return `4` for any integer. I haven't figured out a way how to get variable raw size for integer in this method. I made raw size for integer is constant and equal to `8`.
Yes, after this patch memory consumption for integers will increase, but I don't know a better way to do it yet. At least this fixes bug and implementation becomes more correct
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [x] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [x] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [x] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake