Correct minAreaRect angle to be in range [-90, 0) #28051
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
Box angle range over all imgproc tests is in interval `[-90, -0.0581199]`
resolves https://github.com/opencv/opencv/issues/27667
resolves https://github.com/opencv/opencv/issues/19472
resolves https://github.com/opencv/opencv/issues/24436
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [x] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [x] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [x] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
* improved fitEllipse and fitEllipseDirect accuracy in singular or close-to-singular cases (see issue #9923)
* scale points using double precision
* added normalization to fitEllipseAMS as well; fixed Java test case by raising the tolerance (it's unclear what is the correct result in this case).
* improved point perturbation a bit. make the code a little bit more clear
* trying to fix Java fitEllipseTest by slightly raising the tolerance threshold
* synchronized C++ version of Java's fitEllipse test
* removed trailing whitespaces
fixed the ordering of contour convex hull points
* partially fixed the issue #4539
* fixed warnings and test failures
* fixed integer overflow (issue #14521)
* added comment to force buildbot to re-run
* extended the test for the issue 4539. Check the expected behaviour on the original contour as well
* added comment; fixed typo, renamed another variable for a little better clarity
* added yet another part to the test for issue #4539, where we run convexHull and convexityDetects on the original contour, without any manipulations. the rest of the test stays the same
Added gradiantSize param into goodFeaturesToTrack API (#9618)
* Added gradiantSize param into goodFeaturesToTrack API
Removed hardcode value 3 in goodFeaturesToTrack API, and
added new param 'gradinatSize' in this API so that user can
pass any gradiant size as 3, 5 or 7.
Signed-off-by: Vipin Anand <anand.vipin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Nilaykumar Patel<nilay.nilpat@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Prashanth Voora <prashanthx85@gmail.com>
* fixed compilation error for java test
Signed-off-by: Vipin Anand <anand.vipin@gmail.com>
* Modifying code for previous binary compatibility and fixing other warnings
fixed ABI break issue
resolved merged conflict
compilation error fix
Signed-off-by: Vipin Anand <anand.vipin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Patel, Nilaykumar K <nilay.nilpat@gmail.com>
Dmitry Kurtaev
Maksim Shabunin
Alexander Alekhin
Vadim Pisarevsky
Alexander Alekhin
Suleyman TURKMEN
Vitaly Tuzov
vipinanand4
abratchik
Maksim Shabunin