Feature: weighted Hough Transform #21407
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or other license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to proper branch
- [x] There is reference to original bug report and related work
- [x] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [x] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
Support C++20 standard #26590
Close https://github.com/opencv/opencv/issues/26589
Related https://github.com/opencv/opencv_contrib/pull/3842
Related: https://github.com/opencv/opencv/issues/20269
- do not arithmetic enums and ( different enums or floating numeric)
- remove unused variable
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [x] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [x] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [x] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
core: C-API cleanup: RNG algorithms in core(4.x) #26259
- replace CV_RAND_UNI and NORMAL to cv::RNG::UNIFORM and cv::RNG::NORMAL.
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [x] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [x] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [x] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
Imgproc: use double to determine whether the corners points are within src #26022close#26016
Related https://github.com/opencv/opencv_contrib/pull/3778
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [x] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [x] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [x] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
Correct Bayer2Gray u8 SIMD #25968
SIMD version of CV_DESCALE is not correct. It should be implemented using v_dotprod.
What's more, the stop condition of vector operation should be `bayer < bayer_end - 14` because we just need to make sure result is safely stored into `dst`.
Closes: https://github.com/opencv/opencv/issues/25823
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [x] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [x] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [ ] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
imgproc: add specific error code when cvtColor is used on an image with an invalid number of channels #25981close#25971
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [x] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [x] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [ ] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
pyrDown: offset HAL added, IPP removed #25970Resolves#25976
### Changes
* HAL added for offset support so that border pixels can be fetched from outside of the image ROI (see `BORDER_ISOLATED` parameter)
* IPP removed since there is `pyrUp` instead of `pyrDown` and there's no easy way to fix this other than rewriting it from scratch
* replaced old C call by modern `cv::pyrDown`
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [ ] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [x] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [x] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
Added xxxApprox overloads for YUV color conversions in HAL and AlgorithmHint to cvtColor #25932
The xxxApprox to implement HAL functions with less bits for arithmetic of FP.
The hint was introduced in #25792 and #25911
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [x] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [x] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [x] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
Add a check for src == dst in ocl warpTransform #25898
As mentioned in #25853, when doing WarpAffine with Mat and UMat respectively, if you force the use of the in-place operation (so that src and dst are passed the same variables), Mat produces the correct results, but UMat produces unexpected results.
Obviously in-place operations are not possible with this transformation. When Mat performs the operation, if dst and src are the same variable, the function inherently makes a copy of src without telling the user.
https://github.com/opencv/opencv/blob/74b50c7af05c91194469a1f059f971dff00ef889/modules/imgproc/src/imgwarp.cpp#L2831-L2834
So I did the same check in UMat, but I'm not sure if it's appropriate, should we just do a copy operation without telling the user (even if the user thinks he's doing an in-place operation), or should we throw an exception to indicate that we shouldn't pass in two same variables here?
The possible reason for this problem is that there is a create function here, so it gives the developer the false impression that this create function has allocated new memory for dst, however it does not.
https://github.com/opencv/opencv/blob/74b50c7af05c91194469a1f059f971dff00ef889/modules/imgproc/src/imgwarp.cpp#L2607-L2609
Because by the time the check is done here, the function has returned back.
https://github.com/opencv/opencv/blob/74b50c7af05c91194469a1f059f971dff00ef889/modules/core/src/umatrix.cpp#L668-L675
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [x] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [x] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [x] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
Added flag to GaussianBlur for faster but not bit-exact implementation #25792
Rationale:
Current implementation of GaussianBlur is almost always bit-exact. It helps to get predictable results according platforms, but prohibits most of approximations and optimization tricks.
The patch converts `borderType` parameter to more generic `flags` and introduces `GAUSS_ALLOW_APPROXIMATIONS` flag to allow not bit-exact implementation. With the flag IPP and generic HAL implementation are called first. The flag naming and location is a subject for discussion.
Replaces https://github.com/opencv/opencv/pull/22073
Possibly related issue: https://github.com/opencv/opencv/issues/24135
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [ ] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [x] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [ ] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
Add a new function that approximates the polygon bounding a convex hull with a certain number of sides #25607
merge PR with <https://github.com/opencv/opencv_extra/pull/1179>
This PR is based on the paper [View Frustum Optimization To Maximize Object’s Image Area](https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type=pdf&doi=1fbd43f3827fffeb76641a9c5ab5b625eb5a75ba).
# Problem
I needed to reduce the number of vertices of the convex hull so that the additional area was minimal, andall vertices of the original contour enter the new contour.
# Description
Initially in the contour of n vertices, at each stage we consider the intersection points of the lines formed by each adjacent edges. Each of these intersection points will form a triangle with vertices through which lines pass. Let's choose a triangle with the minimum area and merge the two vertices at the intersection point. We continue until there are more vertices than the specified number of sides of the approximated polygon.
# Complexity:
Using a std::priority_queue or std::set time complexity is **(O(n\*ln(n))**, memory **O(n)**,
n - number of vertices in convex hull.
count of sides - the number of points by which we must reduce.
## Comment
If epsilon_percentage more 0, algorithm can return more values than _side_.
Algorithm returns OutputArray. If OutputArray.type() equals 0, algorithm returns values with InputArray.type().
New test uses image which are not in opencv_extra, needs to be added.
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [ ] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [ ] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [ ] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [ ] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [ ] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [ ] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
imgproc: remove C-API usage from tests #25842
Final cleanup will be done in 5.x after regular merge.
Some tests have been reworked, some required only slight modifications.
Accuracy tests for equalizeHist() added #25759
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [x] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [x] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [x] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
Reverted contour approximation behavior #25680
Related issue #25663 - revert new function behavior despite it returning different result than the old one (reverts PR #25672).
Also added Coverity issue fix.
Tests for cvSmooth -> tests for boxFilter #25634fixes#25448
### Motivation
The obsolete function `cvSmooth` has two modes in which it calls `cv::boxFilter()` inside with and without normalization.
This function is covered by tests exactly for that modes.
This means that by replacing `cvSmooth` call by `cv::boxFilter()` we will leave the coverage untouched (but more obvious) and remove that obsolete function from tests.
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [x] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [x] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [x] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
imgproc: C-API cleanup, drawContours refactor #25564
Changes:
* moved several macros from types_c.h to cvdef.h (assuming we will continue using them)
* removed some cases of C-API usage in _imgproc_ module (`CV_TERMCRIT_*` and `CV_CMP_*`)
* refactored `drawContours` to use C++ API instead of calling `cvDrawContours` + test for filled contours with holes (case with non-filled contours is simpler and is covered in some other tests)
#### Note:
There is one case where old drawContours behavior doesn't match the new one - when `contourIdx == -1` (means "draw all contours") and `maxLevel == 0` (means draw only selected contours, but not what is inside).
From the docs:
> **contourIdx** Parameter indicating a contour to draw. If it is negative, all the contours are drawn.
> **maxLevel** Maximal level for drawn contours. If it is 0, only the specified contour is drawn. If it is 1, the function draws the contour(s) and all the nested contours. If it is 2, the function draws the contours, all the nested contours, all the nested-to-nested contours, and so on. This parameter is only taken into account when there is hierarchy available.
Old behavior - only one first contour is drawn:
a
New behavior (also expected by the test) - all contours are drawn:
imgproc: refactor EMD to reduce C-API usage #25469
- added more tests for EMD
- refactored to remove CvArr
- used BufferArea for memory allocations
- renamed functions and variables and formatted the code
- kept legacy functions intact in separate header
Reworked findContours to reduce C-API usage #25146
What is done:
* rewritten `findContours` and `icvApproximateChainTC89` using C++ data structures
* extracted LINK_RUNS mode to separate new public functions - `findContoursLinkRuns` (it uses completely different algorithm)
* ~added new public `cv::approximateChainTC89`~ - **❌ decided to hide it**
* enabled chain code output (method = 0, no public enum value for this in C++ yet)
* kept old function as `findContours_old` (exported, but not exposed to user)
* added more tests for findContours (`test_contours_new.cpp`), some tests compare results of old function with new one. Following tests have been added:
* contours of random rectangle
* contours of many small (1-2px) blobs
* contours of random noise
* backport of old accuracy test
* separate test for LINK RUNS variant
What is left to be done (can be done now or later):
* improve tests:
* some tests have limited verification (e.g. only verify contour sizes)
* perhaps reference data can be collected and stored
* maybe more test variants can be added (?)
* add enum value for chain code output and a method of returning starting points (e.g. first 8 elements of returned `vector<uchar>` can represent 2 int point coordinates)
* add documentation for new functions - **✔️ DONE**
* check and improve performance (my experiment showed 0.7x-1.1x some time ago)
* remove old functions completely (?)
* change contour return order (BFS) or allow to select it (?)
* return result tree as-is (?) (new data structures should be exposed, bindings should adapt)
First proposal of cv::remap with relative displacement field (#24603) #24621
Implements #24603
Currently, `remap()` is applied as `dst(x, y) <- src(mapX(x, y), mapY(x, y))` It means that the maps must be filled with absolute coordinates.
However, if one wants to remap something according to a displacement field ("warp"), the operation should be `dst(x, y) <- src(x+displacementX(x, y), y+displacementY(x, y))`
It is trivial to build a mapping from a displacement field, but it is an undesirable overhead for CPU and memory.
This PR implements the feature as an experimental option, through the optional flag WARP_RELATIVE_MAP than can be ORed to the interpolation mode.
Since the xy maps might be const, there is no attempt to add the coordinate offset to those maps, and everything is postponed on-the-fly to the very last coordinate computation before fetching `src`. Interestingly, this let `cv::convertMaps()` unchanged since the fractional part of interpolation does not care of the integer coordinate offset.
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [X] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [X] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [X] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [X] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [X] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [ ] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
Fix out of image corners in cv::cornerSubPix #24527
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [ ] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [ ] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [ ] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
Implement color conversion from RGB to YUV422 family #24333
Related PR for extra: https://github.com/opencv/opencv_extra/pull/1104
Hi,
This patch provides CPU and OpenCL implementations of color conversions from RGB/BGR to YUV422 family (such as UYVY and YUY2).
These features would come in useful for enabling standard RGB images to be supplied as input to algorithms or networks that make use of images in YUV422 format directly (for example, on resource constrained devices working with camera images captured in YUV422).
The code, tests and perf tests are all written following the existing pattern. There is also an example `bin/example_cpp_cvtColor_RGB2YUV422` that loads an image from disk, converts it from BGR to UYVY and then back to BGR, and displays the result as a visual check that the conversion works.
The OpenCL performance for the forward conversion implemented here is the same as the existing backward conversion on my hardware. The CPU implementation, unfortunately, isn't very optimized as I am not yet familiar with the SIMD code.
Please let me know if I need to fix something or can make other modifications.
Thanks!
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [x] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [x] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
- [x] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
Fix distanceTransform for inputs with large step and height #24214
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
resolves https://github.com/opencv/opencv/issues/23895
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [x] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [x] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [x] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
MaximSmolskiy
Masahiro Ogawa
Maksim Shabunin
Kumataro
Suleyman TURKMEN
Rostislav Vasilikhin
Vincent Rabaud
inayd
FantasqueX
Rostislav Vasilikhin
Alexander Smorkalov
_Ayaka
Alexander Smorkalov
Mironov Arseny
Robert Lexmann
Alexander Lyulkov
Pierre Chatelier
definitelyuncertain
Sean McBride
Dmitry Kurtaev
Yuriy Chernyshov