docs(imgproc): clarify cv::moments behavior for degenerate contours #28227
relates to https://github.com/opencv/opencv/issues/28222
Clarifies that for degenerate contours (single point or collinear points),
cv::moments() returns m00 == 0 and centroid is undefined.
Documents common workarounds such as boundingRect center or point averaging.
Fix the out-of-bounds read in cv::bilateralFilter for 32f images #28259
### Root Cause Analysis
The issue was caused by a discrepancy between the image range used to allocate the color weight look-up table (LUT) and the actual range of pixel values encountered during filtering, especially near the image borders.
- Range Computation: `cv::bilateralFilter` computes the min/max values of the source image and allocates a `LUT (expLUT)` of size `kExpNumBins + 2` based on this range.
- Border Padding: If `cv::BORDER_CONSTANT` is used (defaulting to 0), and 0 is outside the image's original range (e.g., an image with values between 100 and 200), the padded image will contain values (0) that create differences larger than those accounted for in the `LUT`.
- Out-of-Bounds Access: When calculating the color weight, the code computes an index `idx` from the absolute difference. If this difference exceeds the expected range, `idx` can reach or exceed `kExpNumBins + 1`. Since the code performs linear interpolation using `expLUT[idx]` and `expLUT[idx + 1]`, an `idx` of `kExpNumBins + 1` causes an access to `expLUT[kExpNumBins + 2]`, which is out of bounds.
### Fix
I implemented a robust clamping mechanism in both the SIMD (AVX/SSE) and scalar paths of the bilateral filter invoker:
- Signature Update: Updated `bilateralFilterInvoker_32f` to accept `kExpNumBins` (the maximum valid `LUT` index).
- Clamping: Clamped the computed color difference (alpha) to `kExpNumBins` before calculating the `LUT` index. This ensures that any difference exceeding the planned range is safely treated as the maximum difference in the `LUT` (which usually corresponds to a weight of 0), avoiding any out-of-bounds memory access.
### Modified Files
Modified Files:
`modules/imgproc/src/bilateral_filter.simd.hpp`: Updated the invoker class and SIMD/scalar loops to clamp the LUT index.
`modules/imgproc/src/bilateral_filter.dispatch.cpp`: Updated the dispatch call site to pass the correct LUT size.
Closes#28254
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [x] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [x] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [x] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
imgproc: fix heap-buffer-overflow in stackBlur #28233#28250
### Summary
Fixes a heap-buffer-overflow in `cv::stackBlur` when the kernel size is larger than the image dimensions
### Changes
* Added input validation to clamp the kernel size to the image dimensions.
* Added a regression test (`regression_28233`) covering 1x1 and small image cases.
Fixes#28233
Stateless HAL for filters and morphology. #28208
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [ ] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [ ] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [ ] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [ ] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
Keep convexHull output indices monotone if possible #28163
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
resolves https://github.com/opencv/opencv/issues/24907 ?
resolves https://github.com/opencv/opencv/issues/4954
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [x] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [x] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [ ] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
Replaces wasteful temporary object construction with in-place construction using emplace_back. Covers hot paths in objdetect, imgproc, and stitching modules.
Fixed issues identified by PVS Studio #28185
Partially fixes https://github.com/opencv/opencv/issues/28167
Paper: https://pvs-studio.com/en/blog/posts/cpp/1321/
Closed items: N2, N4, N5, N6, N7, N8, N10, N11, N13, N14.
To be continued...
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [ ] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [ ] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [ ] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [ ] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
Iterative Phase Correlation #28146
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [x] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [x] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [x] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
Test: Add regression test for LINE_4 vs LINE_8 connectivity #28120
Add test to verify correct behavior of LINE_4 (4-connected) and LINE_8 (8-connected) line drawing. This test ensures:
- LINE_4 produces staircase pattern (more pixels) for diagonal lines
- LINE_8 produces diagonal steps (fewer pixels)
- LINE_4 pixels have only horizontal/vertical neighbors (no diagonal-only)
Regression test for issue #26413 where LINE_4 and LINE_8 behaviors were swapped.
Changed condition to correctly route LINE_8 to Line() instead of Line2().
The condition 'line_type == 1 || line_type == 4' was causing LINE_8 (value 8)
to be processed by Line2() which implements 4-connectivity, and LINE_4 (value 4)
to be processed by Line() which was implementing 8-connectivity behavior. This
resulted in swapped line connectivity.
Changed to 'line_type == 1 || line_type == 8' so LINE_8 goes to Line() with
8-connectivity and LINE_4 goes to Line2() with 4-connectivity, matching the
documented behavior where LINE_4 should produce 4-connected lines and LINE_8
should produce 8-connected lines.
Fixes#26413
Correct minAreaRect angle to be in range [-90, 0) #28051
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
Box angle range over all imgproc tests is in interval `[-90, -0.0581199]`
resolves https://github.com/opencv/opencv/issues/27667
resolves https://github.com/opencv/opencv/issues/19472
resolves https://github.com/opencv/opencv/issues/24436
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [x] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [x] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [x] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
Handle near-zero convexity in convexHull #28043
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
resolves https://github.com/opencv/opencv/issues/21482
closes https://github.com/opencv/opencv/issues/14401
Also skip a code that determines orientation inside rotatingCalipers and rely on the order after convexHull
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [x] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [x] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [x] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
Added BitShift option to CLAHE #28014
Briefly, this PR is the fix of https://github.com/opencv/opencv/issues/28002
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [x] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [ ] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [ ] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
imgproc: supports CV_SIMD_SCALABLE in pointSetBoundingRect #27479
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [ ] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [ ] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [ ] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
Fixed standard HoughLines output shift for rho. #27992
Closes: https://github.com/opencv/opencv/issues/25038
Replaces: https://github.com/opencv/opencv/pull/25043
Merge with https://github.com/opencv/opencv_extra/pull/1288
The original implementation introduces systematic shift (-rho/2) for odd indexes. Integer division just gives proper rounding.
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [ ] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [ ] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [ ] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [ ] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
Remove performance bottleneck caused by redundant type conversions in the
initGMMs() function's tight nested loops that iterate over all image pixels.
Changes:
- Changed storage vectors from Vec3f to Vec3b to store pixel data directly
without intermediate conversion
- Modified kmeans preparation to convert Vec3b data to CV_32FC1 only when
creating the Mat for clustering (using convertTo instead of per-pixel cast)
- Explicitly convert Vec3b to Vec3d only when calling addSample() method
Performance Impact:
Previously: Vec3b -> Vec3f (in loop) -> Vec3d (implicit in addSample)
Now: Vec3b (in loop) -> Vec3d (explicit, only in addSample call)
This eliminates one unnecessary type conversion per pixel in the tight loop,
reducing computational overhead especially for large images.
Fixes#27968
Try to fix distant points to save time when ThickLine() calls FillConvexPoly() #27366
Proposal for #27365
cv::clipLine() is useful, but one should take care of a margin to preserve line caps.
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [X] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [X] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [ ] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [ ] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
Refactor minEnclosingCircle tests #27900
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
Separate input points for tests
Before this, next input points depended on previous ones and it was not obvious which input points specific test checked
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [ ] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [ ] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [ ] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
Improved blur #27822
* Perform row and column filter operations in a single pass.
* Temporary storage of intermediate results are avoided.
* Impacts 32F and 64F inputs for ksize <=5.
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [ ] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [ ] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [ ] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
imgproc: add minEnclosingConvexPolygon #27369
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [ ] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [ ] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [ ] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [ ] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
Improved Gaussian Blur #27795
- Horizontal and vertical kernels of 3N131 and 5N14641 are combined for non-border(inner) regions.
- Temporary storage of intermediate results are avoided by combining the kernels.
- Further refinement of other 3N, 5N to be added later.
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [ ] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [x] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [x] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
Set limitation to IPP Bilateral Filter tiles number to avoid too small tiles #27720
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
This PR fixes the following issue in Bilateral Filter tiling in IPP integration: image ROI can't be closer to the image border than the filter window radius. This issue shows itself during separation of the image to tiles for multithreaded processing. If the tile size small enough, the second tile is closer to the upper image border than the bilateral filter radius, which leads to the incorrect result. To fix this, we need a limitation to the tile size - done in this PR.
_Note: red build status looks like unrelated to the current change_
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [ ] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [ ] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [ ] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
Improve fitEllipseDirect tests #27717
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
Previous `fit_and_check_ellipse` implementation was very weak - it only checks that points center lies inside ellipse.
Current implementation `fit_and_check_ellipse` checks that points RMS (Root Mean Square) algebraic distance is quite small. It means that on average points are near boundary of ellipse. Because for points on ellipse algebraic distance is equal to `0` and for points that are close to boundary of ellipse is quite small
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [ ] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [ ] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [ ] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
Fix checking that point lies inside ellipse #27704
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
Previous `check_pt_in_ellipse` implementation was incorrect. For points on ellipse `cv::norm(to_pt)` should be equal to `el_dist`.
I tested current implementation with following Python script:
```
import cv2
import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
from matplotlib.patches import Ellipse
def check_pt_in_ellipse(pt, el):
center, axes, angle = ellipse
to_pt = pt - center
el_angle = angle * np.pi / 180
to_pt_r_x = to_pt[0] * np.cos(-el_angle) - to_pt[1] * np.sin(-el_angle)
to_pt_r_y = to_pt[0] * np.sin(-el_angle) + to_pt[1] * np.cos(-el_angle)
pt_angle = np.arctan2(to_pt_r_y / axes[1], to_pt_r_x / axes[0])
x_dist = 0.5 * axes[0] * np.cos(pt_angle)
y_dist = 0.5 * axes[1] * np.sin(pt_angle)
el_dist = np.sqrt(x_dist * x_dist + y_dist * y_dist)
assert abs(np.linalg.norm(to_pt) - el_dist) < 1e-10
# TEST(Imgproc_FitEllipse_Issue_4515, accuracy) {
points = np.array([
[327, 317],
[328, 316],
[329, 315],
[330, 314],
[331, 314],
[332, 314],
[333, 315],
[333, 316],
[333, 317],
[333, 318],
[333, 319],
[333, 320],
])
ellipse = cv2.fitEllipseDirect(points)
center, axes, angle = ellipse
angle_rad = np.deg2rad(angle)
points_on_ellipse = []
for point_angle_deg in range(0, 360, 10):
point_angle = np.deg2rad(point_angle_deg)
point = np.array([0., 0.])
point_x = axes[0] * 0.5 * np.cos(point_angle)
point_y = axes[1] * 0.5 * np.sin(point_angle)
point[0] = point_x * np.cos(angle_rad) - point_y * np.sin(angle_rad)
point[1] = point_x * np.sin(angle_rad) + point_y * np.cos(angle_rad)
point[0] += center[0]
point[1] += center[1]
points_on_ellipse.append(point)
points_on_ellipse = np.array(points_on_ellipse)
for point in points_on_ellipse:
check_pt_in_ellipse(point, ellipse)
plt.figure(figsize=(8, 8))
plt.scatter(points[:, 0], points[:, 1], c='red', label='points')
plt.scatter(points_on_ellipse[:, 0], points_on_ellipse[:, 1], c='yellow', label='ellipse')
ellipse = Ellipse(xy=center, width=axes[0], height=axes[1],
angle=angle, facecolor='none', edgecolor='b')
plt.gca().add_patch(ellipse)
plt.gca().set_aspect('equal')
plt.legend()
plt.show()
```
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [ ] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [ ] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [ ] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
Subdiv2d rect2f clean #27641
Closes https://github.com/opencv/opencv/issues/27623
Changes:
- Added Subdiv2D(Rect2f) constructor overload
- Added initDelaunay(Rect2f) method overload
- No changes to the previous implementation to keep it backward compatible
- Added tests for init and testing with edge case of extremely small coordinates
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [x] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [x] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [x] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
See original pull request at : https://github.com/opencv/opencv/pull/27631
imgproc: Bilateral filter performance improvement #27433
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [ ] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [x] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [ ] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
optimize some drawing with stack allocation #27599
Some drawings can try a stack allocation instead of a std::vector
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [X] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [ ] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [ ] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [ ] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
Take into account overflow for connected components #27582
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
Fix#27568
The problem was caused by a label type overflow (`debug_example.npy` contains `92103` labels, that doesn't fit in the `CV_16U` (`unsigned short`) type). If pass `CV_32S` instead of `CV_16U` as `ltype` - everything will be calculated successfully
Added overflow detection to throw exception with a clear error message instead of strange segfault/assertion error
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [x] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [x] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [x] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
Fixed build issue with some old GCC versions #27569
Fixes build for GCC 4.8.5 at least. Looks like the method default signature differs cross GCC versions or newer version has softer checker.
### Pull Request Readiness Checklist
See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request
- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [ ] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [ ] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [ ] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [ ] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake
raimbekovm
Dheeraj Alamuri
Alexander Smorkalov
Abhishek Shinde
satyam yadav
Alexander Smorkalov
Dmitry Kurtaev
AdwaithBatchu
zdenyhraz
Ghazi-raad
Vincent Rabaud
Kumataro
Galina Bykova
harunresit
penghuiho
Yuantao Feng
Samaresh Kumar Singh
Pierre Chatelier
MaximSmolskiy
ashish-sriram
SaraKuhnert
Madan mohan Manokar
underdevelopedprefrontalcortex
Nadezhda Mizonova
Aditya Jha
ekharkov