Merge pull request #24578 from Kumataro:fix_verify_unsupported_new_mat_depth

Fix verify unsupported new mat depth for nonzero/minmax/lut #24578

`cv::LUI()`, `cv::minMaxLoc()`, `cv::minMaxIdx()`, `cv::countNonZero()`, `cv::findNonZero()` and `cv::hasNonZero()` uses depth-based function table. However, it is too short for `CV_16BF`, `CV_Bool`, `CV_64U`, `CV_64S` and `CV_32U` and it may occur out-boundary-access. This patch fix it. And If necessary, when someone extends these functions to support, please relax this test.

### Pull Request Readiness Checklist

See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request

- [x] I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
- [x] To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
- [x] The PR is proposed to the proper branch
- [x] There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
- [x] There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
      Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
- [x] The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake

modules/ts/include/opencv2/ts/ts_perf.hpp

@@ -160,7 +160,8 @@ private:
     };                                                                                  \
     static inline void PrintTo(const class_name& t, std::ostream* os) { t.PrintTo(os); } }
 
-CV_ENUM(MatDepth, CV_8U, CV_8S, CV_16U, CV_16S, CV_32S, CV_32F, CV_64F, CV_16F)
+CV_ENUM(MatDepth, CV_8U, CV_8S, CV_16U, CV_16S, CV_32S, CV_32F, CV_64F, CV_16F, \
+                  CV_16BF, CV_Bool, CV_64U, CV_64S, CV_32U)
 
 /*****************************************************************************************\
 *                 Regression control utility for performance testing                      *